<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Segment7: Return of Syck</title>
    <link>http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2008/06/12/return-of-syck</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>The Blog</description>
    <item>
      <title>Return of Syck</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="irc://irc.freenode.net/#rubinius"&gt;#rubinius&lt;/a&gt;, the royal struggle between syck and RbYAML.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;pre&gt;
Defiler: re rbyaml also
Defiler: Why aren't we using syck though?
Defiler: rbyaml is totally not compliant with what MRI is expecting to
         have happen
drbrain: syck period, or the syck extension from MRI?
Defiler: "Why are we using rbyaml" is what I should have said, I guess
drbrain: Back in Ye Olden Times of Late Last December
drbrain: We had a wrapper for the syck library that was not MRI's syck
         extension
drbrain: For in Ye Olden Days, Fair Subtend was not so Fair
drbrain: Thus, a Newcomer was Raised to Ye Throne of YAML
drbrain: RbYAML
drbrain: Now, with the waxing power of Subtend, the MRI syck extension
         may reclaim its Rightful Crown
&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:30:20 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:ca1e487c-00d8-4671-a3f7-1ca32b812665</guid>
      <author>drbrain@segment7.net (Eric Hodel)</author>
      <link>http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2008/06/12/return-of-syck</link>
      <category>Rubinius</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
